My name is Amartuvshin.I was born in Selenge. I'm twenty years old . My birthday is on 28th of March.
I study in information communication technology university.
Make a presentation including bibliography/references which will show your source of information gathered.
Details about the reliability of your information, why did you choose the source, and to what extent can you trust the source and why- e.g. a company report might be more upbeat about the situation of the company than an externally conducted analysis similarly. Similarly you might identify conflicting information from different newspapers on their political biases etc how did you get around this.
Details about the reliability of your information, why did you choose the source, and to what extent can you trust the source and why- e.g. a company report might be more upbeat about the situation of the company than an externally conducted analysis similarly. Similarly you might identify conflicting information from different newspapers on their political biases etc how did you get around this.
Leadership and management have been amongst the most studied and
controversial topics of the study of business and management for the
last century. The body of theory which has grown up around the
subject reflects the change in thought on management theory and can be
distilled into a framework which shows the evolution f the ideas of
what makes a good leader and management, and by proxy of this one can
define with reference to the theory the key skills which need to be
developed in order to produce good leaders. Broadly there have been a
number of movements in the thought on leadership and management,
beginning with the ‘great man’ approach, defined in a number of studies
on the history of leadership and management studies as the belief that
leaders are exceptional people born to great innate abilities, this
reflects the early school of militaristic styles of leadership,
reflected in the organisation as a male dominated and hierarchical
structures to business as a whole. This data is drawn from two key
studies, one a study of the comparisons of more modern
transformational leadership compared with previous styles, which allows
one to assess the need for key innate personality traits, the other a
modern study of an attempt to define a universal framework of
leadership. Both of these studies argue that a key part of the
management and leadership of an organisation, despite the move from the
great man approach, is still rooted in the idea of an inspirational
character with innate abilities.
These abilities have also been studied with some detail and indeed the evolutionary process in management thought moved from this point to study the traits that made an effective leader and manager. The table shown below comes from an extensive study on the skills and traits of leaders, and is still used in theory to define those skills advantageous to leaders and managers.
These abilities have also been studied with some detail and indeed the evolutionary process in management thought moved from this point to study the traits that made an effective leader and manager. The table shown below comes from an extensive study on the skills and traits of leaders, and is still used in theory to define those skills advantageous to leaders and managers.
This move away from seeing the organization as more than a hierarchy
with leaders at the top of the pile and workers as subservient to them
is a dramatic change in management theory and suggests that in
designing any effective leadership or management structure and training
the type and classification of the organization and the people
involved become central to the success. Clearly this is demonstrated by
a body of literature on the subject of behavioral management, and it
is easy to see why the move become more popular than traditional
management as it follows a move in the philosophy of management as a
whole. The behavioral School I still important, but the consensus has
been that it cannot explain everything in the leadership and management
paradigm. Modern thought has centered on a contingency paradigm,
which begins from the point that there is no one way to manage or lead,
and the correct style is contingent on the nature of the organization,
the external needs of the business and society and the internal needs
of the workers and management. A number of models have been
produced, from ones dealing with social enterprise and the public
sector, of which this example from the National College for School
Leadership is an example of the types of leadership they have
identified.
“The International Masters Program in Practicing Management is designed
to be the "Next Generation" Masters Program, combining management
development with management education. It is a degree program that
focuses directly on the development of managers in their own contexts -
their jobs and their organizations. The IMPM is therefore deeper than
conventional programs of management development and more applied than
traditional degree programs. It was launched in March of 1996 to acclaim
from participants and their companies alike, as well as from the
international business press.
“The IMPM seeks to break the mould of the functional "silos" so common
in management education - marketing, finance, organization behaviour,
and so on. Instead, the Program is structured around managerial
"mindsets", one for each module. It opens in Lancaster with managing in
general and the reflective mindset in particular. Then it moves to McGill, where attention turns to Managing Organizations and the analytic mindset. Bangalore follows with Managing Context, the worldly mindset. In Japan, it takes up Managing Relationships, the collaborative mindset. The Program closes at INSEAD with Managing Change, the action mindset.
More detail is given about each of these mindsets by Mintzberg and Gosling
More detail is given about each of these mindsets by Mintzberg and Gosling
bn
